That was interesting B, but far from easy for me :) Since I wont be online later, I am posting my question early. Enjoy!
The boundaries chosen for continents have always been unsettling to me. Were they meant to delineate changes in civilisational scope, of geographical or climatic changes or ethnicities and cultures of the people who inhabit them? Or perhaps they're just an exercise in eurocentrism? Asia being largest and most unwieldy of them all seems especially disjoint. Asians look as different from each other as from any of their extra-continental cousins. The cuisines, the climate, culture and language families are widely different in the middle east, north¢ral asia, south asia, northeast and southeast asia. Today's question draws on what I think would would be a basis of a pan-asian (well, at least a larger part of asia than other ideas I can think of) identity.
Today's answer (A) is a place that flourished in the past, but is in ruins today. It played host to two of the greatest thinkers of what Karl Jaspers called the axial age (800BCE -200BCE). Although it was established long before, A was thickly populated and received wide royal patronage only starting 5th century ACE, when it can be said to have entered its golden period. Although it was laid waste twice, first by the huns in the 5th century and again by a southern asault a century and half later, it was restored both times to its former glory. But, with time came inevitable decay which was precipitated in 1197ACE by turkic invaders who destroyed it a third, and to date, final time. It is said that the lack of a copy of the koran within its famed confines invited their special ire. Although there is a lack of much written records from A itself, a scholar from the Tang dynasty and a Persian historian later have documented the glory and destruction of A respectively. Although the ruins were re-discovered in the 19th century, it is only recently that there has been a serious proposal among a host of Asian countries led by Singapore and including Japan, China and India to revive A's traditions. Identify the location of A and its relevance.
Other ideas that can be a basis of asian solidarity are obviously welcome in comments!! Although I won't forbid googling explicitly, let's make that a last resort...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Nalanda/ Bihar.
FD: (I googled for turkic invaders), till then I was thinking it terms of around Afghanistan.
I assume Kandahar because of the location + lack of written records and so on ..
I would go with Peshawar, under the Gandhara kingdom. I was initially confused between Takshashila and Peshawar, but according to Wiki the main destruction under foreign invasions occurred in Peshawar.
Rahul can you disable comments?
--------------
Wasted by the Huns, so its most likely in the Middle-East/Near East. Japan, Singapore, China, India want to revive it's traditions means it has something to do with Buddhism???
There are 2 ruins I know in the area: Petra and Persepolis. Petra is the more famous one, and also more likely to be invaded by the Turks, so thats my guess.
Discovered this blog just now... good stuff.
-Suhas
Thanks to all for the answers!
As some of you suggested, my pan-asian idea is indeed Buddhism.
The axial age thinkers I referred to were Siddharta and Mahavira both of whom spent significant amounts of time in Nalanda in the sixth century BCE when it was already a great center of mainly buddhist learning but without the trappings of the organised "university" setting that would come later. The lack of much authenticated records is a clue towards ancient India and its oral traditions. Under the Gupta kings, it received wide royal patronage and was rebuilt twice after being ravaged, first by the swetha huna mihirakula and then by the gaudas from the south.
Xuanzhang, the Tang Chinese pilgrim in his travels in search of Buddhist texts described the glory of Nalanda whereas Persian accounts talk of its final sacking by Bakhtiyar Khilji in 1197. British Archaeologists rediscovered its ruins in the 19th centuty but it is only in the 21st that a serious proposal to begin a modern university there was mooted. If wikipedia is to be believed, classes are to start this year :)
Congratulations to Sanjith for the right answer and to Pratz, Ishani and Nikhil for well thought out attempts!
Post a Comment